<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><rss xmlns:atom='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom' xmlns:openSearch='http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/' version='2.0'><channel><atom:id>http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27719315/posts/full</atom:id><lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Jul 2006 06:38:55 +0000</lastBuildDate><title>Psycler</title><description></description><link>http://www.psycler.com</link><managingEditor>Psycler</managingEditor><generator>Blogger</generator><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>15</openSearch:itemsPerPage><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27719315/posts/full/116299978679712083</guid><pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2006 15:29:46 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2006-11-08T07:29:47.136-08:00</atom:updated><title>Witness says Kazaa activity can be monitored</title><description>&lt;div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">&lt;br/>&lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Astroturfing" >Astroturfing - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia&lt;/a> &lt;br/> &lt;blockquote>In politics and advertising, the term astroturfing describes formal public relations (PR) campaigns which seek to create the impression of being a spontaneous, grassroots behavior. Hence the reference to the "AstroTurf" (artificial grass) is a metaphor to indicate "fake grassroots" support.&lt;br />&lt;br />The goal of such campaign is to disguise the agenda of a political client as an independent public reaction to some political entity —a politician, political group, product, service, event. Astroturfers attempt to orchestrate the actions of apparently diverse and geographically distributed individuals, by both overt ("outreach," "awareness," etc.) and covert (disinformation) means. Astroturfing may be undertaken by anything from an individual pushing their own personal agenda through to highly organised professional groups with financial backing from large corporations.&lt;/blockquote>&lt;/div></description><link>http://www.psycler.com/2006/11/witness-says-kazaa-activity-can-be.html</link><author>Psycler</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27719315/posts/full/116259804733544049</guid><pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2006 23:54:07 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2006-11-03T15:54:07.340-08:00</atom:updated><title> Remains of two 9/11 victims identified</title><description>&lt;div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">&lt;br/>&lt;a href="http://www.cnn.com/2006/US/11/02/wtc.remains.reut/index.html" >Remains of two 9/11 victims identified - CNN.com&lt;/a> &lt;br/> Remains of a flight attendant and passenger on the first plane to hit the World Trade Center on September 11 have been identified.&lt;br />&lt;br />The New York medical examiner's office said in a statement that it had now identified remains of Karen Ann Martin, the 40-year-old head flight attendant on American Airlines Flight 11, which slammed into the trade center's north tower. Remains of Douglas Joel Stone, 54, who was a passenger on the same flight as Martin, were also identified.&lt;br />&lt;br />The identified remains were not among those turned up by recent searches in the Ground Zero area.&lt;br />&lt;br />Some families of the 2,749 people killed in the Twin Towers attack gathered at Ground Zero on Thursday to demand a comprehensive search by forensic experts after the discovery of bones by workers clearing rubble from manholes two weeks ago.&lt;br />&lt;br />Since then more than 200 body parts, ranging from 1 inch to 12 inches in length, have been found.&lt;br />&lt;br />"We must show our absolute solidarity at the site where the remains of the 9/11 dead have lain ignored and unburied for over five years," organizers of the rally said in a statement. "It is time to stand up and be counted. There can be no more haphazard discovery of human body parts and personal effects."&lt;br />&lt;br />"We demand a scientific, well-organized controlled survey of Ground Zero by a reputable entity."&lt;br />&lt;br />Of the 2,749 victims of the Twin Towers attack, 1,148 are yet to be recovered or identified. The Office of the Chief Medical Examiner said more than 20,800 remains had been recovered and nearly 11,000 of those had been identified.&lt;br />&lt;br />The death toll in the attacks included nine crew members, 76 passengers and five hijackers on American Airlines Flight 11, and nine crew, 51 passengers and five hijackers aboard United Airlines Flight 175, which slammed into the trade center's south tower 18 minutes after the first strike.&lt;br />&lt;br />New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg has defended the site cleanup, although he said he was at a loss to explain why the bones discovered during the past two weeks had not been recovered sooner.&lt;br />&lt;br />The manholes where the bones were first discovered on October 19 had been covered by a temporary road built after the attacks to allow in cranes to start removing debris. On October 27 Bloomberg agreed to expand the search underground, on rooftops and in some of the buildings surrounding Ground Zero.&lt;br />&lt;br />Construction of a new Freedom Tower at the World Trade Center site began in April after bickering over financing, security and design delayed plans.&lt;br />&lt;br />Bloomberg has said no construction delays are expected as a result of the new searches.&lt;/div></description><link>http://www.psycler.com/2006/11/remains-of-two-911-victims-identified.html</link><author>Psycler</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27719315/posts/full/116044851145059933</guid><pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2006 02:48:31 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2006-10-09T19:48:31.516-07:00</atom:updated><title> Middle East: "The number of US troops being wound...</title><description>&lt;div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">&lt;a href="http://news.independent.co.uk/world/middle_east/article1822196.ece">Independent Online Edition > Middle East&lt;/a>: "The number of US troops being wounded in Iraq is now at its highest level for two years as American forces are confronted by increasing sectarian violence and a continuing insurgency.&lt;br />&lt;br />Figures released by the Pentagon show that 776 soldiers were wounded in action in Iraq last month.&lt;br />&lt;br />The September figure represents the fourth largest casualty rate since the US and UK invasion in the spring of 2003 and the largest since November 2004 when US forces were involved in a major offensive to clear the city of Fallujah. Some experts believe the number of wounded provides a better insight to the nature of the conflict in Iraq than the figure of 2,700 killed because - in relation to previous wars - many more wounded troops survive.&lt;br />&lt;br />The ratio of wounded to killed is 8 to 1, compared with 3 to 1 during the Vietnam War. Anthony Cordesman, of the Centre for Strategic and International Studies, told The Washington Post: 'These days wounded are a much better measure of the intensity of the operations than killed.'&lt;br />&lt;br />The release of the figure came as violence yesterday continued to rock Iraq. US and Iraqi forces were involved in clashes with Shia militia in the southern city of Diwaniyah for the second time in as many months. The US claimed about 30 militia fighters were killed during the operation to secure a 'high value' target&lt;br />&lt;p>On Saturday two more US soldiers were killed, bringing the overall death toll to 2,741.&lt;/p> &lt;p>Military experts say the increasing toll of wounded US troops may in part be explained by a shift in their duties in recent months - with thousands being moved into Baghdad in an effort to stop the killing of civilians by rival Sunni and Shia factions.&lt;/p> &lt;p>US commanders have asked for 3,000 Iraqi troops to bolster their presence but so far have received only a few hundred.&lt;/p>"&lt;/div></description><link>http://www.psycler.com/2006/10/middle-east-number-of-us-troops-being.html</link><author>Psycler</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27719315/posts/full/116033098196339859</guid><pubDate>Sun, 08 Oct 2006 18:09:41 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2006-10-08T11:09:41.970-07:00</atom:updated><title>The Raw Story | No Angelina wedding until gays can...</title><description>&lt;div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">&lt;a href="http://rawstory.com/news/2006/No_Angelina_wedding_until_gays_can__09082006.html">The Raw Story | No Angelina wedding until gays can marry&lt;/a>:&lt;br />"Los Angeles- Actor Brad Pitt will not marry Angelina Jolie until restrictions on gay marriage are lifted, the star said in an interview released Friday. Jolie gave birth to their child in May after two previous adoptions, but Pitt said there was no chance of them tying the knot while others in the US were denied the same privilege.&lt;br />&lt;br />'Angie and I will consider tying the knot when everyone else in the country who wants to be married is legally able,' the 42-year-old actor told Esquire magazine for its October issue. "&lt;br />&lt;br />&lt;br />&lt;a href="http://www.dnaindia.com/report.asp?NewsID=1057491">DNA - World - Angelina Jolie wants more lesbian scenes - Daily News &amp;amp; Analysis&lt;/a>: "Angelina Jolie adores performing love scenes with women – as she gets a chance to chat about shopping between takes.&lt;br />&lt;br />According to the web site contactmusic.com, Jolie, 31, admitted that she misses girl-to-girl discussions whenever she has to get steamy on screen with a man.&lt;br />&lt;br />The Tomb Raider star said, 'I do definitely prefer love scenes with a woman and wouldn't hesitate to do some in the future.&lt;br />&lt;br />'I love doing them because between takes you talk about the sales. One minute you're in a passionate clinch with the woman, and then the next you're discussing what outfits to wear for your night out,' the web site added.&lt;br />&lt;br />The star is presently in Pune, India, along with Brad Pitt, shooting for a movie on slain journalist Daniel Pearl."&lt;br />&lt;br />&lt;br />So I'm letting it down. I think Brad and Angelina are gay. nuff said&lt;/div></description><link>http://www.psycler.com/2006/10/raw-story-no-angelina-wedding-until.html</link><author>Psycler</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27719315/posts/full/115942377364068276</guid><pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2006 06:09:33 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2006-09-27T23:09:33.736-07:00</atom:updated><title>CNN.com - Pathologist: 'Classical' drug combo kill...</title><description>&lt;div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">&lt;a href="http://www.cnn.com/2006/SHOWBIZ/TV/09/27/smith.son.ap/index.html">CNN.com - Pathologist: 'Classical' drug combo killed Smith's son - Sep 27, 2006&lt;/a>:&lt;br />&lt;br />"Anna Nicole Smith's 20-year-old son died from a lethal combination of methadone and two antidepressant drugs, a U.S.-based pathologist who conducted a private autopsy said Wednesday.&lt;br />&lt;br />Toxicology tests showed Daniel Smith had methadone, Zoloft and Lexapro in his system when he died September 10 in a hospital room in the Bahamas where his former Playboy Playmate mother was recuperating from giving birth to a daughter, according to Cyril Wecht.&lt;br />&lt;br />'The fact that we have these drugs and the levels of the drugs overwhelmingly and most logically point to this being a tragic, accidental, drug-related death,' Wecht said from his home in the Pittsburgh area.&lt;br />&lt;br />Wecht said Smith apparently died from a 'classical' combination of the drugs which had a lethal 'cumulative effect on the central nervous system.'"&lt;br />&lt;br />Told you so. He overdosed on his anti depressants and her Methadone. How do we know it's hers? Oh we know she has had a pill problem in the past and kid has little need for methadone at his age. It was hers and he popped one.&lt;/div></description><link>http://www.psycler.com/2006/09/cnn_27.html</link><author>Psycler</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27719315/posts/full/115933177223009840</guid><pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 04:36:12 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2006-09-26T21:36:12.426-07:00</atom:updated><title>CNN.com - Attorney: I'm Anna Nicole's baby's daddy...</title><description>&lt;div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">&lt;a href="http://www.cnn.com/2006/SHOWBIZ/TV/09/26/smith.baby/index.html">CNN.com - Attorney: I'm Anna Nicole's baby's daddy - Sep 26, 2006&lt;/a>: "An attorney representing former Playboy Playmate and reality television star Anna Nicole Smith said Tuesday he is the father of her daughter, born earlier this month in the Bahamas.&lt;br />&lt;br />Howard K. Stern added that he plans to marry Smith.&lt;br />&lt;br />'Anna and I have been in a relationship and we love each other, and it's been going on for a very long time, and because of my relationship as her lawyer, we felt that it was best to keep everything hidden,' Howard K. Stern told CNN's 'Larry King Live.'"&lt;br />&lt;br />I told you so. Next we'll find the matching scripts and I'm 3 for 3 bitch. He now has control of half her estate without Daniel to fight it.&lt;/div></description><link>http://www.psycler.com/2006/09/cnn_26.html</link><author>Psycler</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27719315/posts/full/115860870354738682</guid><pubDate>Mon, 18 Sep 2006 19:45:03 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2006-09-18T12:45:03.556-07:00</atom:updated><title>ABC News: 'Day of Rage': Anger Not Jihad: "Three w...</title><description>&lt;div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">&lt;a href="http://abcnews.go.com/International/story?id=2458889&amp;amp;page=1">ABC News: 'Day of Rage': Anger Not Jihad&lt;/a>: "Three words suddenly have a lot of Westerners worried and, it must be said, likely making some wrong assumptions about modern Islam. 'Yaum al Ghadab' is Arabic for 'Day of Rage.'&lt;br />&lt;br />When the Qatari Islamic scholar Yusuf al-Qaradawi called for a Day of Rage this Friday in response to Pope Benedict XVI's remarks about Muslims, it might have sounded like a call for street violence.&lt;br />&lt;br />But if there is trouble Friday, and there could well be, it will not be because of language but because of what some people choose to do after they have answered the call for 'Yaum al Ghadab.'&lt;br />&lt;br />Political manipulation of protest crowds is not a uniquely Islamic idea. It happens in the West, as well.&lt;br />&lt;br />But why do Islamic leaders use what many Westerners regard as inflammatory language?&lt;br />&lt;br />Because it is not inflammatory, at least not in the context of Islamic culture. 'We must not try to interpret Islamic terms and cultural signals by using our Western ideas,' said Fawaz Gerges, a professor in the department of international affairs and Middle Eastern studies at Sarah Lawrence College, and an ABC News consultant. Gerges pointed out that in Islamic culture 'ghadab' means anger or frustration. A day of rage does not mean a day of jihad (war), added Gerges."&lt;/div></description><link>http://www.psycler.com/2006/09/abc-news-day-of-rage-anger-not-jihad.html</link><author>Psycler</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27719315/posts/full/115860800786153656</guid><pubDate>Mon, 18 Sep 2006 19:33:27 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2006-09-18T12:33:27.876-07:00</atom:updated><title>CNN.com - Pathologist: Anna Nicole's son on antide...</title><description>&lt;div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">&lt;a href="http://www.cnn.com/2006/SHOWBIZ/TV/09/18/annanicolesmith.son.ap/index.html">CNN.com - Pathologist: Anna Nicole's son on antidepressants - Sep 18, 2006&lt;/a>:&lt;br />"Anna Nicole Smith's son was on prescription anti-depression medication when he died at the hospital bedside of the former reality TV star, a pathologist who did a second autopsy on 20-year-old Daniel Smith said Monday.&lt;br />&lt;br />Forensic pathologist Cyril Wecht said Daniel Smith was being treated for depression that began about four to six weeks earlier, but he did not know whether the medication played any role in his death, which came three days after his celebrity mother gave birth in the Bahamas.&lt;br />&lt;br />Wecht, speaking by phone from Miami a day after conducting the autopsy in the Bahamas, said he's still awaiting toxicology tests to determine the cause of death.&lt;br />&lt;br />He said he and the Bahamian coroner who did the first autopsy agreed there was no evidence that Daniel Smith died from a 'suicidal overdose.'&lt;br />&lt;br />Smith died September 10 in the hospital room where the former Playboy model was recuperating from giving birth to a daughter.&lt;br />&lt;br />Wecht said he spoke to the psychiatrist who treated Daniel Smith and was told the dosage of the antidepressant medication was 'quite low' and that the depression 'had to do with a girlfriend.'"&lt;br />&lt;br />Told you so. He died of an overdose. Next is to find if his script matches one his mom had. Then all the pieces fall in place. Note: Stern is still silent.&lt;/div></description><link>http://www.psycler.com/2006/09/cnn_18.html</link><author>Psycler</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27719315/posts/full/115852639490189569</guid><pubDate>Sun, 17 Sep 2006 20:53:14 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2006-09-17T13:53:15.013-07:00</atom:updated><title>Yahoo! Top Stories - Anna Nicole Couldn't Revive, ...</title><description>&lt;div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">&lt;a href="http://entertainment.tv.yahoo.com/entnews/eo/20060915/115835622000.html">Yahoo! Top Stories - Anna Nicole Couldn't Revive, Remember Son&lt;/a>: "Anna Nicole Smith experienced a mother's worst nightmare when her 20-year-old son, Daniel, suddenly died over the weekend. Now comes word she might have experienced it twice.&lt;br />&lt;br />According to a representative for the former Playmate, Smith was so shaken by the 'suspicious' death of her boy that she experienced memory loss of the tragic event, causing her lawyer and close friend Howard K. Stern to have to break the devastating news to Smith a second time.&lt;br />&lt;br />'The devastation and grief over Daniel's sudden death coupled with the sedation has been so extreme that Anna Nicole experienced memory loss of the event,' Michael Scott, another of Smith's legal team, said in a statement Wednesday."&lt;/div></description><link>http://www.psycler.com/2006/09/yahoo-top-stories-anna-nicole-couldnt.html</link><author>Psycler</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27719315/posts/full/115817923881711964</guid><pubDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2006 20:27:18 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2006-09-13T13:27:18.826-07:00</atom:updated><title>ABC News: Sixth-Grade Girls Could Be Vaccinated Ag...</title><description>&lt;div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">&lt;a href="http://abcnews.go.com/Health/CancerPreventionAndTreatment/story?id=2427967&amp;amp;page=1">ABC News: Sixth-Grade Girls Could Be Vaccinated Against Cervical Cancer&lt;/a>:&lt;br />"Sixth-grade girls in Michigan could be the first required to be vaccinated against cervical cancer under a proposed new law.&lt;br />&lt;br />Leesa Tobin of Ann Arbor, who is the mother of an 11-year-old girl, says it makes perfect sense.&lt;br />&lt;br />'This is a no-brainer, as far as I'm concerned,' she said. 'With a very simple decision, I can make it possible for my daughter to never have to experience a fear of this disease.'&lt;br />&lt;br />The legislation, the first of its kind, was sponsored by Republican state Sen. Beverly Hammerstrom, who says all 12 of her female Senate colleagues — Republicans and Democrats — immediately signed on."&lt;br />&lt;br />The vaccination will cause another cancer or even worse sterilaztion or some bullshit. Thi is bad. These vaccinations are not as good as they have us believe.&lt;/div></description><link>http://www.psycler.com/2006/09/abc-news-sixth-grade-girls-could-be.html</link><author>Psycler</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27719315/posts/full/115817845982537181</guid><pubDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2006 20:14:19 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2006-09-13T13:14:19.826-07:00</atom:updated><title>PINOLE / 3 animal-rights activists get prison time...</title><description>&lt;div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">&lt;a href="http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2006/09/13/BAGO3L4KB21.DTL">PINOLE / 3 animal-rights activists get prison time / Terms from federal judge in New Jersey range from 4-6 years&lt;/a>:&lt;br />&lt;br />"Three animal rights activists from Pinole were sentenced Tuesday to four to six years in prison on federal charges of conspiring to stalk, harass and intimidate employees of a New Jersey scientific testing firm and the companies that do business with that firm.&lt;br />&lt;br />Kevin Kjonaas, 28, Lauren Gazzola, 27, and Jacob Conroy, 30, were also ordered by U.S. District Judge Anne Thompson in Trenton, N.J., to pay a total of $1 million in restitution to Huntingdon Life Sciences, which uses animals for laboratory research and testing.&lt;br />&lt;br />The three were part of Stop Huntingdon Animal Cruelty USA, which is devoted to trying to put the East Millstone, N.J., company out of business.&lt;br />&lt;br />Kjonaas, a former president of the group, received a six-year sentence. Gazzola, the former campaign coordinator, received a 52-month sentence, and Conroy, a coordinator and the group's Web site manager, received a four-year sentence.&lt;br />&lt;br />The judge will sentence Joshua Harper, 31, the group's West Coast coordinator, today and two other defendants, New York coordinator Andrew Stepanian, 27, and Darius Fullmer, 29, on Tuesday. Federal prosecutors dropped charges last year against a seventh defendant, John McGee.&lt;br />&lt;br />An attorney for Kjonaas, Robert Stahl, said Tuesd"&lt;/div></description><link>http://www.psycler.com/2006/09/pinole-3-animal-rights-activists-get.html</link><author>Psycler</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27719315/posts/full/115817812174853615</guid><pubDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2006 20:08:41 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2006-09-13T13:08:41.750-07:00</atom:updated><title>Official: Smith's Son's Death Suspicious - Forbes....</title><description>&lt;div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">&lt;a href="http://www.forbes.com/business/feeds/ap/2006/09/13/ap3014539.html">Official: Smith's Son's Death Suspicious - Forbes.com&lt;/a>:&lt;br />&lt;br />"The death of Anna Nicole Smith's 20-year-old son was termed 'suspicious' Wednesday by the coroner's office, which scheduled a formal inquiry that could lead to criminal charges.&lt;br />&lt;br />Authorities said at least one other person was in the hospital room when Daniel Wayne Smith died Sunday while visiting his mother, a reality TV star and former Playboy playmate, three days after she gave birth to a baby girl. "&lt;br />&lt;br />Her boyfriend attorney Howard Stern was there. The kid died from an overdose on his mommy's scrip.&lt;/div></description><link>http://www.psycler.com/2006/09/official-smiths-sons-death-suspicious.html</link><author>Psycler</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27719315/posts/full/115817784785290095</guid><pubDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2006 20:04:07 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2006-09-13T13:04:07.866-07:00</atom:updated><title>USATODAY.com - FDA whistle-blower Graham blasts ne...</title><description>&lt;div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">&lt;a href="http://www.usatoday.com/news/health/2006-09-12-merck-drug_x.htm">USATODAY.com - FDA whistle-blower Graham blasts new Merck arthritis drug&lt;/a>:&lt;br />&lt;br />"The arthritis drug that Merck has developed to compete with Celebrex may be as risky for the heart as Vioxx, writes Food and Drug Administration whistle-blower David Graham in an editorial posted online Tuesday by a medical journal.&lt;br />&lt;br />In considering whether Arcoxia should be approved, 'the FDA, academia, and the medical research enterprise are once again faced with the opportunity to forsake common sense by willfully accepting misdirection and disinformation presented in the guise of science,' Graham writes on the Journal of the American Medical Association's website.&lt;br />&lt;br />An editor's note says the FDA allowed Graham to write the editorial as a private citizen, not as an agency employee. The editorial and the two studies it accompanies will run in the Oct. 4 JAMA, but they were posted online early 'because of the public health implications,' a JAMA press release says."&lt;/div></description><link>http://www.psycler.com/2006/09/usatoday.html</link><author>Psycler</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27719315/posts/full/115811453384223871</guid><pubDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2006 02:28:53 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2006-09-12T19:28:55.246-07:00</atom:updated><title>CNN.com - Air Force chief: Test weapons on testy U...</title><description>&lt;div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">&lt;a href="http://www.cnn.com/2006/US/09/12/usaf.weapons.ap/index.html">CNN.com - Air Force chief: Test weapons on testy U.S. mobs - Sep 12, 2006&lt;/a>:&lt;br />&lt;br />"&lt;b>WASHINGTON&lt;/b> (AP) -- Nonlethal weapons such as high-power microwave devices should be used on American citizens in crowd-control situations before being used on the battlefield, the Air Force secretary said Tuesday.&lt;p>The object is basically public relations. Domestic use would make it easier to avoid questions from others about possible safety considerations, said Secretary Michael Wynne.&lt;/p>&lt;p>"If we're not willing to use it here against our fellow citizens, then we should not be willing to use it in a wartime situation," said Wynne. "(Because) if I hit somebody with a nonlethal weapon and they claim that it injured them in a way that was not intended, I think that I would be vilified in the world press."&lt;/p>&lt;p>The Air Force has paid for research into nonlethal weapons, but he said the service is unlikely to spend more money on development until injury problems are reviewed by medical experts and resolved."&lt;/p>&lt;p>How fucked up is this? This fucking idiot is a chief in the United States Air Force and he suggests we test this horrible fucking weapon on our own people before we use it in battle against a supposed enemy because it will make it easier to answer to people later. It appears that it's ok to shoot people in battle and carpet bomb their ass back into the middle ages but God forbid we use a nonlethal weapon on them. He thinks its best we guinea pig Americans instead of the fucking enemy. In my opinion this ass is fired. Get him out of office immediately. Who fucking wants this asshole running our military. Surely no American. Stand up and make certain this fuck is stopped before he fucking slaughters Americans with misuse of his untested weapons.&lt;br />&lt;/p>&lt;/div></description><link>http://www.psycler.com/2006/09/cnn.html</link><author>Psycler</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27719315/posts/full/115667197341875726</guid><pubDate>Sun, 27 Aug 2006 09:46:13 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2006-08-27T02:46:13.430-07:00</atom:updated><title>Dear Democracy Now! | 911Blogger.com:

"Dear Democ...</title><description>&lt;div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">&lt;a href="http://www.911blogger.com/node/2271">Dear Democracy Now! | 911Blogger.com&lt;/a>:&lt;br />&lt;br />"Dear Democracy Now!                 &lt;!-- begin content -->               &lt;span class="submitted">Submitted by &lt;a href="http://www.911blogger.com/user/5" title="View user profile.">Reprehensor&lt;/a> on Fri, 08/25/2006 - 1:11pm.&lt;/span>     &lt;span class="taxonomy">&lt;a href="http://www.911blogger.com/taxonomy/term/162" rel="tag" title="">Amy Goodman&lt;/a>&lt;/span>     &lt;!-- google_ad_section_start --> &lt;p>Dear Democracy Now!,&lt;/p> &lt;p>On Wednesday, May 26th, 2004, you featured a "debate" between &lt;a href="http://www.publiceye.org/conspire/Post911/dubious_claims.html">Chip Berlet&lt;/a> and author &lt;a href="http://www.publiceye.org/conspire/Post911/Griffin1.html">David Ray Griffin&lt;/a> - &lt;em>"The New Pearl Harbor: A Debate On A New Book That Alleges The Bush Administration Was Behind The 9/11 Attacks"&lt;/em> - (&lt;a href="http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=04/05/26/150221&amp;mode=thread&amp;amp;tid=25">Link.&lt;/a>)&lt;/p> &lt;p>Many people who have been following skepticism of the "official story" of 9/11 were deeply disappointed by this lopsided "debate", which more or less concluded with this challenge by Amy Goodman;&lt;/p> &lt;blockquote>&lt;p>&lt;strong>AMY GOODMAN:&lt;/strong> Name just one. &lt;em>Name just one structural engineering expert who said it is not feasible that the planes caused the towers to go down.&lt;/em> &lt;/p>&lt;/blockquote> &lt;p>You will be pleased to note that we can name one now, his name is &lt;strong>Charles N. Pegelow&lt;/strong>, you can read his resume &lt;a href="http://www.911blogger.com/node/2257">here.&lt;/a>&lt;/p> &lt;p>Since naming one "just one" Structural Engineer "who said it is not feasible that the planes caused the towers to go down" seems to be some sort of litmus test for Democracy Now!, surely it's time for a rematch. Or at the very least, &lt;strong>a serious critical examination&lt;/strong> of the mountain of evidence that suggests that the "official" story of 9/11 (as recorded by the 9/11 Commission in their Report) should be undertaken, (finally), by Democracy Now!?&lt;/p> &lt;p>Or, are the rumors that foundation funding will stop if Democracy Now! undertakes a serious examination of alternative 9/11 theories, (Referred to by many as "9/11 Truth") true?&lt;/p> &lt;p>Is a lop-sided hit-piece debate seriously the best we can expect from D-Now!?&lt;/p> &lt;p>Are you aware that a &lt;a href="http://www.gnn.tv/B16240">Professor of Economics&lt;/a> (Paul Zarembka) has studied publicly available data regarding the "put" option rumors that arose after 9/11 and found that &lt;strong>"indeed, there is evidence of insider trading before 9-11 on American Airlines and United Airlines."&lt;/strong>&lt;/p> &lt;p>Are you aware that one of the most astute researchers of British and American covert operations writing today (Nafeez Mosaddeq Ahmed) has spent 5 years researching al-Qaeda &amp; 9/11 and &lt;a href="http://www.gnn.tv/B16240">concluded&lt;/a> that, &lt;strong>"It (al-Qaeda) has no existence as an independent concrete entity. It designates a highly developed category of Western covert operations designed to secure destabilization through the creation, multiplication, mobilization, and manipulation of disparate mujahideen groups. The evidence suggests that this was certainly the case on 9-11."&lt;/strong>&lt;/p> &lt;p>Are you aware of the large data dump of &lt;a href="http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/html/nyregion/20050812_WTC_GRAPHIC/met_WTC_histories_full_01.html">First-Responder oral histories&lt;/a> made public last year by the &lt;em>New York Times&lt;/em>? Here are some samples;&lt;/p> &lt;blockquote>&lt;p>"we heard . . . what sounded like a loud explosion and looked up and I saw tower two start coming down" - Sudnick.&lt;/p> &lt;p>"I heard three explosions, and then . . . tower two started to come down" - Darnowski.&lt;/p> &lt;p>"it almost sounded like bombs going off, like boom, boom, boom, like seven or eight" - Turilli.&lt;/p> &lt;p>"heard explosions coming from . . . the south tower. . . . There were about ten explosions. . . . We then realized the building started to come down" - Carlsen.&lt;/p> &lt;p>"it looked like the building was blowing out on all four sides. We actually heard the pops" - Meola.&lt;/p> &lt;p>"It was a frigging noise. At first I thought it was---do you ever see professional demolition where they set the charges on certain floors and then you hear 'Pop, pop, pop, pop, pop'? . . . I thought it was that." - Rivera.&lt;/p> &lt;p>"the building popped, lower than the fire. . . . I was going oh, my god, there is a secondary device because the way the building popped. I thought it was an explosion" - Burke.&lt;/p> &lt;p>"It actually gave at a lower floor, not the floor where the plane hit. . . . [W]e originally had thought there was like an internal detonation, explosives, because it went in succession, boom, boom, boom, boom, and then the tower came down" - Cachia.&lt;/p>&lt;/blockquote> &lt;p>Democracy Now! broadcasts from a former N.Y.F.D. &lt;a href="http://democracynow.org/downloads/DCTVfirehouse.JPG">Firehouse&lt;/a>, shouldn't this testimony be considered merely out of respect for the many NY fire personnel who died on duty on 9/11?&lt;/p> &lt;p>How can you just ignore it? Downplay it? Ridicule it? Belittle it?&lt;/p> &lt;p>I hope that others will join me in asking Democracy Now! to wake up, clear the fog, abandon the propaganda, &lt;em>and start asking some serious questions about what happened to this country on 9/11/2001.&lt;/em>&lt;/p> &lt;p>Sincerely,&lt;/p> &lt;p>A skeptic.&lt;/p>"&lt;/div></description><link>http://www.psycler.com/2006/08/dear-democracy-now-911blogger.html</link><author>Psycler</author></item></channel></rss>